Strukturiranje · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

PITANJE

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Da li jedno značajno utiče na drugo? Odlučuju tri četvrtine datih glasova.

Gledate kao gost. Unesite korisničko ime da biste se pridružili i učestvovali.

Pitanja se raspodeljuju između grupa, pa dobijate ona koja su data vašoj grupi — ne svih 180.

zašto

Niko ne bi mogao da odgovori na nekoliko stotina parova. Svaki par ide jednoj grupi; par na kome se panel podeli zatim se upućuje drugim grupama, pa može kasnije da se pojavi na vašem spisku iako je počeo negde drugde. Broj rešenih uključuje rad svih grupa, zato raste brže nego što se vaš spisak smanjuje.

rešeno: 176 / 180 za vaš odgovor: 0

Poslednje prebrojavanje: rešeno: 176 · prosleđeno panelima više grupa: 2 · sporno: 0 · ispod kvoruma: 2 — panelima treba najmanje max(2, 75% panela) datih glasova; vaš najmanji panel ima 15 članova.

zatvori ✕

We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how → utiče na? → The metric is claims processed

Još ništa nije rečeno.

Završena faza — zapis parova i glasova stoji iznad.Proveri logiku ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	otvoreno prosleđeno	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	otvoreno prosleđeno	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	otvoreno	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	otvoreno	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ da	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ da	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ da	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ da	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ da	diskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ da	diskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ da	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ da	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ da	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ da	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ da	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ da	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ da	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ da	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ da	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ da	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ da	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ da	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ da	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ izvedeno	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ izvedeno	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ izvedeno	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ izvedeno	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ ne	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ ne	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ ne	diskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ ne	diskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ ne	diskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ ne	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ ne	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ ne	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ ne	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ ne	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ ne	u fokusu ↑ · zatvori ✕
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ ne	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ ne	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ ne	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ ne	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ ne	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ ne	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ ne	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ ne	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ ne	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ ne	diskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ ne	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ ne	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ ne	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ ne	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ ne	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ ne	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ ne	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ ne	diskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ ne	diskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ ne	diskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ ne	diskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ ne	diskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ ne	diskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ ne	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ ne	diskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ ne	diskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ ne	diskutuj