Struktura · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

PYTANIE

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Czy jedno istotnie wpływa na drugie? Decydują trzy czwarte oddanych głosów.

Podgląd jako gość. Podaj nazwę użytkownika, żeby dołączyć i wziąć udział.

Pytania są rozdzielane między grupy, więc dostajesz te, które przypadły Twojej grupie — nie wszystkie (łącznie: 180).

dlaczego

Nikt nie odpowie na kilkaset par. Każda para trafia do jednej grupy; para, przy której zdania się podzieliły, jest potem kierowana do innych grup, więc może pojawić się później na Twojej liście, choć zaczęła gdzie indziej. Liczba rozstrzygniętych obejmuje pracę wszystkich grup, dlatego rośnie szybciej, niż maleje Twoja lista.

rozstrzygnięte: 176 / 180 do odpowiedzi: 0

Ostatnie liczenie głosów: rozstrzygnięte: 176 · przekazane panelom międzygrupowym: 2 · sporne: 0 · poniżej kworum: 2 — panele potrzebują co najmniej max(2, 75% panelu) oddanych głosów; Twój najmniejszy panel ma 15 członków.

zamknij ✕

We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how → wpływa? → Editors ask whether anyone else has run it

Nikt jeszcze nic nie napisał.

Etap zakończony — zapis par i głosów jest powyżej.Sprawdź logikę ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	otwarte przekazane dalej	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	otwarte przekazane dalej	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	otwarte	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	otwarte	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ tak	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ tak	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ tak	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ tak	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ tak	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ tak	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ tak	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ tak	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ tak	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ tak	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ wywnioskowane	dyskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ wywnioskowane	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ wywnioskowane	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ wywnioskowane	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ nie	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nie	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ nie	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ nie	w centrum uwagi ↑ · zamknij ✕
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ nie	dyskutuj
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ nie	dyskutuj
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ nie	dyskutuj
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ nie	dyskutuj
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ nie	dyskutuj