Penyusunan · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

PERTANYAANNYA

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Apakah yang satu sangat memengaruhi yang lain? Tiga perempat dari suara yang masuk menentukan.

Melihat sebagai tamu. Masukkan nama pengguna untuk bergabung dan ikut serta.

Pertanyaan dibagi di antara kelompok, jadi Anda mendapat pertanyaan yang diberikan kepada kelompok Anda — tidak semua 180.

mengapa

Tidak ada yang sanggup menjawab ratusan pasangan. Setiap pasangan diberikan kepada satu kelompok; pasangan yang membuat panel terbelah lalu dirujuk ke kelompok lain, jadi pasangan itu bisa muncul di daftar Anda belakangan meskipun berasal dari tempat lain. Jumlah yang tuntas mencakup kerja semua kelompok, karena itulah angkanya naik lebih cepat daripada daftar Anda berkurang.

176 / 180 tuntas 0 untuk Anda jawab

Penghitungan terakhir: 176 diputuskan · 2 diteruskan ke panel lintas kelompok · 0 diperdebatkan · 2 di bawah kuorum — panel memerlukan setidaknya max(2, 75% panel) suara masuk; panel terkecil Anda beranggotakan 15 orang.

tutup ✕

We cover the row about the change, never the change → memengaruhi? → The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it

Belum ada yang berbicara.

Tahap sudah selesai — catatan pasangan dan suara ada di atas.Periksa logikanya ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	terbuka diteruskan	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	terbuka diteruskan	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	terbuka	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	terbuka	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ ya	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ ya	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ ya	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ ya	diskusikan
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ ya	diskusikan
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ ya	diskusikan
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ ya	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ ya	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ ya	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ ya	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ ya	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ ya	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ ya	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ ya	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ ya	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ ya	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ ya	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ ya	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ ya	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ disimpulkan	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ disimpulkan	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ disimpulkan	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ disimpulkan	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	disorot ↑ · tutup ✕
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ tidak	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ tidak	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ tidak	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ tidak	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ tidak	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ tidak	diskusikan
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ tidak	diskusikan
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ tidak	diskusikan
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ tidak	diskusikan
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ tidak	diskusikan