Cấu trúc · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

CÂU HỎI

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Liệu cái này có ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến cái kia không? Ba phần tư số phiếu đã bỏ sẽ quyết định.

Đang xem với tư cách khách. Nhập tên người dùng để vào và tham gia.

Các câu hỏi được chia cho các nhóm, nên bạn nhận những câu được giao cho nhóm mình — không phải cả 180 câu.

vì sao

Không ai trả lời nổi vài trăm cặp thẻ. Mỗi cặp được giao cho một nhóm; cặp nào bị chia rẽ sẽ được chuyển sang các nhóm khác, nên nó có thể xuất hiện trong danh sách của bạn sau này dù bắt đầu ở nơi khác. Số đã ngã ngũ tính cả công việc của mọi nhóm, vì vậy nó tăng nhanh hơn tốc độ danh sách của bạn ngắn lại.

176 / 180 đã ngã ngũ 0 câu chờ bạn trả lời

Lần kiểm phiếu gần nhất: 176 đã quyết · 2 chuyển lên hội đồng liên nhóm · 0 còn tranh cãi · 2 chưa đủ số người tối thiểu — hội đồng cần ít nhất max(2, 75% hội đồng) phiếu đã bỏ; hội đồng nhỏ nhất của bạn có 15 thành viên.

đóng ✕

The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it → ảnh hưởng? → Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric

Chưa ai nói gì.

Giai đoạn đã xong — hồ sơ các cặp thẻ và phiếu bầu nằm ở trên.Kiểm tra lập luận ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	đang mở đã chuyển lên	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	đang mở đã chuyển lên	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	đang mở	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	đang mở	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ có	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ có	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ có	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ có	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ có	thảo luận
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ có	thảo luận
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ có	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ có	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ có	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ có	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ có	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ có	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ có	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ có	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ có	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ có	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ có	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ có	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ có	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ suy ra	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ suy ra	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ suy ra	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ suy ra	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ không	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ không	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ không	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ không	thảo luận
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ không	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ không	thảo luận
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ không	thảo luận
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ không	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ không	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ không	thảo luận
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ không	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ không	thảo luận
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ không	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ không	thảo luận
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ không	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ không	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ không	thảo luận
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ không	thảo luận
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ không	đang mở ↑ · đóng ✕
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ không	thảo luận
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ không	thảo luận
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ không	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ không	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ không	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ không	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ không	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ không	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ không	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ không	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ không	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ không	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ không	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ không	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ không	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ không	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ không	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ không	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ không	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ không	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ không	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ không	thảo luận
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ không	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ không	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ không	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ không	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ không	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ không	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ không	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ không	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ không	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ không	thảo luận
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ không	thảo luận
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ không	thảo luận
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ không	thảo luận
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ không	thảo luận
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ không	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ không	thảo luận
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ không	thảo luận
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ không	thảo luận