True Causes
RU
Bahasa IndonesiaDanskDeutschEnglishEspañolFrançaisItalianoNederlandsNorskPolskiPortuguêsSrpski (latinica)SvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάРусскийСрпски (ћирилица)Українська中文日本語한국어
← в начало
7/7 · Действия · просмотр: Структурирование
людей: 30 · идей: 34
нажмите на завершенный этап, чтобы посмотреть его
✓
Сбор
✓
Пояснение
✓
Группировка
✓
Отбор
✓
Структурирование
✓
Карта
7
Действия
пробный прогон · не учитывается
препятствия · любой, у кого есть ссылка · в открытом списке · федерация включена
ведущий: ее ведущий (запечатана)
людей: 30 · идей: 34 · 2 группы · 3 комнаты в федерации
Паспорт → · Логика → · протокол
↗ поделиться этой картой
На другом сайте, как живая карта:
Как изображение: https://truecauses.org/d/c29b4cd/map.svg
Как данные: все оцененные пары в этой комнате (CSV). У каждого утверждения есть свой адрес, /c/c29b4cd/<card>, он указан под картой.
Укажите источник при публикации: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/c29b4cd
ВОПРОС

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Существенно ли одно влияет на другое? Решают три четверти поданных голосов.

закрыто · назад к этапу «Действия»
Вы смотрите как гость. Введите имя пользователя, чтобы присоединиться и участвовать.
Вопросы распределяются между группами, поэтому вы получаете те, что достались вашей группе, — а не все 180.
почему
Никто не смог бы ответить на несколько сотен пар. Каждая пара достается одной группе; пара, по которой мнения разделились, затем передается другим группам, поэтому она может позже появиться в вашем списке, хотя началась в другом месте. Число решенных включает работу всех групп, поэтому оно растет быстрее, чем сокращается ваш список.
решено: 176 / 180 ждут вашего ответа: 0
Последний подсчет: решено: 176 · передано панелям из нескольких групп: 2 · спорно: 0 · ниже кворума: 2 — панелям нужно не меньше max(2, 75% панели) поданных голосов; в вашей самой маленькой панели 15 участников.
закрыть ✕
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them → влияет на? → The metric is claims processed
Пока ничего не сказано.
Этап завершен — запись пар и голосов приведена выше.Проверить логику ↗
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumedоткрыто передано дальшеобсудить
The metric is claims processed→Editors ask whether anyone else has run itоткрыто передано дальшеобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every fieldоткрытообсудить
The metric is claims processed→We label the claim and cannot label the confidenceоткрытообсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→We cover the row about the change, never the change✓ даобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✓ даобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✓ даобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✓ даобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✓ даобсудить
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✓ даобсудить
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✓ даобсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✓ даобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✓ даобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✓ даобсудить
The metric is claims processed→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✓ даобсудить
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✓ даобсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✓ даобсудить
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→We label the claim and cannot label the confidence✓ даобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→The metric is claims processed✓ даобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✓ даобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→We label the claim and cannot label the confidence✓ даобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✓ даобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✓ даобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✓ выведенообсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✓ выведенообсудить
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→The metric is claims processed✓ выведенов фокусе ↑ · закрыть ✕
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✓ выведенообсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed✗ нетобсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✗ нетобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✗ нетобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✗ нетобсудить
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✗ нетобсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✗ нетобсудить
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✗ нетобсудить
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✗ нетобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed✗ нетобсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→We cover the row about the change, never the change✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed✗ нетобсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed✗ нетобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'✗ нетобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→We cover the row about the change, never the change✗ нетобсудить
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→We cover the row about the change, never the change✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✗ нетобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→We cover the row about the change, never the change✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→We cover the row about the change, never the change✗ нетобсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed✗ нетобсудить
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✗ нетобсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
We cover the row about the change, never the change→Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→We cover the row about the change, never the change✗ нетобсудить
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric→The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour→We cover the row about the change, never the change✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→We cover the row about the change, never the change✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric✗ нетобсудить
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'→Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field✗ нетобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field✗ нетобсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✗ нетобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→The metric is claims processed✗ нетобсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✗ нетобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→The metric is claims processed✗ нетобсудить
The metric is claims processed→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field✗ нетобсудить
The metric is claims processed→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✗ нетобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✗ нетобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→The metric is claims processed✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→We label the claim and cannot label the confidence✗ нетобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field✗ нетобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field✗ нетобсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→We label the claim and cannot label the confidence✗ нетобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
The metric is claims processed→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✗ нетобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
The metric is claims processed→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✗ нетобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→Editors ask whether anyone else has run it✗ нетобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→Editors ask whether anyone else has run it✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→Editors ask whether anyone else has run it✗ нетобсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→The metric is claims processed✗ нетобсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→We label the claim and cannot label the confidence✗ нетобсудить
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→Editors ask whether anyone else has run it✗ нетобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✗ нетобсудить
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→The metric is claims processed✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→The metric is claims processed✗ нетобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→Editors ask whether anyone else has run it✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field✗ нетобсудить
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✗ нетобсудить
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them✗ нетобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→The metric is claims processed✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→Editors ask whether anyone else has run it✗ нетобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✗ нетобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→Editors ask whether anyone else has run it✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field✗ нетобсудить
The metric is claims processed→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✗ нетобсудить
By the time we could confirm it, it was old→We label the claim and cannot label the confidence✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→We label the claim and cannot label the confidence✗ нетобсудить
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them→By the time we could confirm it, it was old✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical✗ нетобсудить
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✗ нетобсудить
The metric is claims processed→We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how✗ нетобсудить
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→We label the claim and cannot label the confidence✗ нетобсудить
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field→Editors ask whether anyone else has run it✗ нетобсудить
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how→Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim✗ нетобсудить