構造化 · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

問い

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

一方は他方に大きく影響しますか？投じられた票の4分の3で決まります。

ゲストとして閲覧中。参加するにはユーザー名を入力してください。

問いはグループに分配されるので、あなたに届くのは自分のグループに割り当てられたものだけです（全180件ではありません）。

理由

数百ものペアに答えられる人はいません。各ペアは一つのグループに渡され、意見が割れたペアは他のグループに回されます。そのため、別のところで始まったペアが後からあなたの一覧に現れることがあります。決着の数にはすべてのグループの作業が含まれるので、自分の一覧が減るより速く増えていきます。

決着 176/180 あなたの回答待ち：0

前回の集計：決着 176 · グループ横断パネルへ回付 2 · 争いあり 0 · 定足数未満 2 — パネルには max(2, パネルの75%) 以上の票が必要です。最小のパネルのメンバーは15人です.

閉じる ✕

Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric → 影響する？ → The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it

まだ発言はありません。

完了した段階です。ペアと投票の記録は上にあります。論理を確かめる ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	未決回付済み	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	未決回付済み	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	未決	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	未決	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ はい	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ はい	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ はい	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ はい	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ はい	議論する
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ はい	議論する
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ はい	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ はい	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ はい	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ はい	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ はい	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ はい	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ はい	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ はい	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ はい	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ はい	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ はい	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ はい	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ はい	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ 推論	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ 推論	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ 推論	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ 推論	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ いいえ	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ いいえ	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ いいえ	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ いいえ	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	表示中 ↑ · 閉じる ✕
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ いいえ	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ いいえ	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ いいえ	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ いいえ	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ いいえ	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ いいえ	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ いいえ	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ いいえ	議論する
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	議論する
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ いいえ	議論する
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ いいえ	議論する
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ いいえ	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ いいえ	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ いいえ	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ いいえ	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ いいえ	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ いいえ	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ いいえ	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ いいえ	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ いいえ	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ いいえ	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ いいえ	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ いいえ	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ いいえ	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ いいえ	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ いいえ	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ いいえ	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ いいえ	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ いいえ	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ いいえ	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ いいえ	議論する
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ いいえ	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ いいえ	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ いいえ	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ いいえ	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ いいえ	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ いいえ	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ いいえ	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ いいえ	議論する
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ いいえ	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ いいえ	議論する
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ いいえ	議論する
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ いいえ	議論する
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ いいえ	議論する
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ いいえ	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ いいえ	議論する
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ いいえ	議論する
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ いいえ	議論する