结构 · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

问题

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

一方是否显著影响另一方？达到所投票数的四分之三即为定论。

已关闭 · 返回行动阶段

正以访客身份查看。输入用户名即可加入并参与。

问题在各小组之间分配，所以你拿到的是分给你们小组的那些——不是全部 180 个。

为什么

没有人能回答几百个卡片对。每个卡片对交给一个小组；意见分裂的卡片对会再转给其他小组，所以它可能稍后出现在你的列表中，即使它起初在别处。已定数量包括所有小组的工作，所以它增长得比你自己的列表缩短得快。

已定 176 / 180 0 个待你回答

上次计票：176 个已定 · 2 个上交跨组评审组 · 0 个有争议 · 2 个未达法定人数 — 每个评审组至少需要 max(2, 评审组人数的 75%) 张票；你们最小的评审组有 15 名成员.

关闭 ✕

By the time we could confirm it, it was old → 有影响？ → The metric is claims processed

还没有人发言。

已完成的阶段——卡片对和投票的记录见上方。检查逻辑 ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	未定已上交	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	未定已上交	讨论
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	未定	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	未定	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ 是	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ 是	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ 是	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ 是	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ 是	讨论
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ 是	讨论
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ 是	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ 是	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ 是	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ 是	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ 是	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ 是	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ 是	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ 是	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ 是	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ 是	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ 是	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ 是	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ 是	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ 推断	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ 推断	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ 推断	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ 推断	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ 否	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 否	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ 否	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ 否	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ 否	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 否	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 否	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ 否	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ 否	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ 否	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ 否	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ 否	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ 否	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ 否	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 否	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ 否	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ 否	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ 否	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 否	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ 否	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ 否	讨论
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ 否	讨论
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ 否	讨论
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ 否	讨论
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ 否	讨论
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ 否	讨论
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ 否	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ 否	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ 否	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ 否	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ 否	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ 否	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ 否	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ 否	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ 否	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ 否	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ 否	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ 否	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 否	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ 否	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 否	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ 否	讨论
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ 否	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ 否	讨论
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ 否	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ 否	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ 否	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ 否	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ 否	讨论
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ 否	讨论
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ 否	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ 否	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ 否	当前焦点 ↑ · 关闭 ✕
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ 否	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ 否	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ 否	讨论
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ 否	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ 否	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ 否	讨论
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ 否	讨论
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ 否	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ 否	讨论
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ 否	讨论
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ 否	讨论
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ 否	讨论
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ 否	讨论
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 否	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ 否	讨论
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ 否	讨论
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ 否	讨论