Estructuración · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

LA PREGUNTA

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

¿Influye una significativamente en la otra? Deciden tres cuartas partes de los votos emitidos.

Viendo como invitado. Escribe un nombre de usuario para unirte y participar.

Las preguntas se reparten entre los grupos, así que recibes las que le tocaron al tuyo — no las 180.

por qué

Nadie podría responder varios cientos de pares. Cada par va a un grupo; un par que se divide se deriva después a otros grupos, así que puede aparecer más tarde en tu lista aunque empezara en otro sitio. La cifra de resueltas incluye el trabajo de todos los grupos, y por eso sube más rápido de lo que se acorta tu propia lista.

resueltas: 176 / 180 por responder: 0

Último recuento: decididas: 176 · derivadas a paneles entre grupos: 2 · disputadas: 0 · sin quórum: 2 — los paneles necesitan al menos max(2, 75 % del panel) votos emitidos; tu panel más pequeño tiene 15 miembros.

cerrar ✕

By the time we could confirm it, it was old → ¿influye en? → Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported

Nadie ha dicho nada aún.

Fase terminada — el registro de pares y votos queda arriba.Comprobar la lógica ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	abierto derivado	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	abierto derivado	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	abierto	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	abierto	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ sí	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ sí	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ sí	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ sí	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ sí	discutir
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ sí	discutir
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ sí	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ sí	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ sí	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ sí	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ sí	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ sí	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ sí	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ sí	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ sí	discutir
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ sí	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ sí	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ sí	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ sí	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ inferido	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ inferido	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ inferido	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ inferido	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discutir
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discutir
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discutir
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discutir
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discutir
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discutir
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discutir
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discutir
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discutir
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discutir
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discutir
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discutir
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discutir
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	en foco ↑ · cerrar ✕
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discutir
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discutir
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discutir
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discutir
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discutir
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discutir
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discutir
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discutir
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discutir
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discutir
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discutir
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discutir
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discutir