Structuration · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

LA QUESTION

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

L’une influence-t-elle fortement l’autre ? Les trois quarts des votes exprimés décident.

Mode invité. Choisissez un pseudo pour rejoindre la salle et participer.

Les questions sont réparties entre les groupes : vous recevez celles attribuées à votre groupe — pas toutes les 180.

pourquoi

Personne ne pourrait répondre à plusieurs centaines de paires. Chaque paire va à un groupe ; une paire sur laquelle le groupe se divise est ensuite renvoyée à d’autres groupes, et peut donc apparaître plus tard dans votre liste même si elle a commencé ailleurs. Le nombre de paires tranchées inclut le travail de tous les groupes : c’est pourquoi il monte plus vite que votre propre liste ne diminue.

tranchées : 176 / 180 à vous de répondre : 0

Dernier décompte : tranchées : 176 · transmises à des panels inter-groupes : 2 · contestées : 0 · sous le quorum : 2 — les panels ont besoin d’au moins max(2, 75 % du panel) votes exprimés ; votre plus petit panel compte 15 membres.

fermer ✕

Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical → influence ? → The metric is claims processed

Rien n’a encore été dit.

Phase terminée — l’archive des paires et des votes figure ci-dessus.Vérifier la logique ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	ouvert transmis	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	ouvert transmis	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	ouvert	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	ouvert	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ oui	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ oui	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ oui	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ oui	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ oui	discuter
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ oui	discuter
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ oui	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ oui	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ oui	discuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ oui	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ oui	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ oui	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ oui	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ oui	discuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ oui	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ oui	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ oui	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ oui	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ oui	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ déduit	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ déduit	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ déduit	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ déduit	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ non	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ non	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ non	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ non	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ non	discuter
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ non	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ non	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ non	discuter
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ non	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ non	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ non	discuter
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ non	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ non	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ non	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ non	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ non	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ non	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ non	discuter
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ non	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ non	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ non	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ non	discuter
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ non	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ non	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ non	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ non	discuter
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ non	discuter
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ non	discuter
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ non	discuter
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ non	discuter
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ non	discuter
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ non	discuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ non	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ non	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ non	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ non	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ non	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ non	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ non	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ non	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ non	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ non	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ non	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ non	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ non	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ non	discuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ non	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ non	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ non	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ non	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ non	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ non	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ non	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ non	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ non	discuter
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ non	discuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ non	discuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ non	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ non	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ non	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ non	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ non	au premier plan ↑ · fermer ✕
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ non	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ non	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ non	discuter
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ non	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ non	discuter
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ non	discuter
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ non	discuter
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ non	discuter
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ non	discuter
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ non	discuter
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ non	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ non	discuter
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ non	discuter
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ non	discuter