Struttura · Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

LA DOMANDA

Why are corrections never as loud as the claim?

Una influisce in modo significativo sull’altra? Decidono i tre quarti dei voti espressi.

Stai guardando come ospite. Inserisci un nome utente per entrare e partecipare.

Le domande sono distribuite tra i gruppi, quindi ricevi quelle assegnate al tuo gruppo — non tutte e 180.

perché

Nessuno potrebbe rispondere a diverse centinaia di coppie. Ogni coppia va a un gruppo; una coppia su cui il gruppo si divide passa poi ad altri gruppi, quindi può comparire più tardi nel tuo elenco anche se è partita altrove. Il numero delle risolte include il lavoro di tutti i gruppi, ed è per questo che sale più in fretta di quanto si accorci il tuo elenco.

risolte: 176 / 180 da rispondere: 0

Ultimo conteggio: decise: 176 · passate ai panel tra gruppi: 2 · contese: 0 · sotto il quorum: 2 — i panel richiedono almeno max(2, 75% del panel) voti espressi; il tuo panel più piccolo ha 15 membri.

chiudi ✕

Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical → influisce su? → Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported

Ancora nessun intervento.

Fase conclusa — lo storico delle coppie e dei voti è qui sopra.Verifica la logica ↗

Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	aperta passata oltre	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	aperta passata oltre	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	aperta	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	aperta	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✓ sì	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ sì	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ sì	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ sì	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ sì	discuti
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ sì	discuti
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✓ sì	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✓ sì	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✓ sì	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✓ sì	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ sì	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ sì	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ sì	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ sì	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ sì	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ sì	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✓ sì	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ sì	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✓ sì	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✓ per deduzione	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✓ per deduzione	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	The metric is claims processed	✓ per deduzione	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✓ per deduzione	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discuti
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discuti
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discuti
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	✗ no	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discuti
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discuti
Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
We cover the row about the change, never the change	→	Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	✗ no	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discuti
Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	→	The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	✗ no	discuti
Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	Nobody measures whether our corrections reach the people who saw the claim	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	We cover the row about the change, never the change	✗ no	discuti
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	→	Checking the powerful is slower per claim, so it loses on the metric	✗ no	discuti
Being first is rewarded and being right is assumed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
The quiet revision is not an event, so it is not news	→	Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	✗ no	discuti
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
There is no news hook for 'the advice changed and nobody said'	→	Checking an institution takes weeks and checking a tweet takes an hour	✗ no	discuti
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed	→	The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it	✗ no	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discuti
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discuti
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discuti
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discuti
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discuti
Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discuti
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	✗ no	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	The metric is claims processed	✗ no	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	in primo piano ↑ · chiudi ✕
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discuti
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	→	A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	✗ no	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discuti
By the time we could confirm it, it was old	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discuti
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discuti
We are asked to check claims, not the guidance that generated them	→	By the time we could confirm it, it was old	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	✗ no	discuti
Our funding is project-based and follows whatever is topical	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discuti
The metric is claims processed	→	We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	✗ no	discuti
Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	✗ no	discuti
We label the claim and cannot label the confidence	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported	✗ no	discuti
A newsroom cannot hold a specialist for every field	→	Editors ask whether anyone else has run it	✗ no	discuti
We say we are independent and the audience is right to ask how	→	Nobody is checking the structure that produced the claim	✗ no	discuti