구조 잡기 · Why are mass crimes so rarely prosecuted?

질문

Why are mass crimes so rarely prosecuted?

한쪽이 다른 쪽에 크게 영향을 줍니까? 던진 표의 4분의 3으로 정합니다.

게스트로 보는 중. 참여하려면 닉네임을 입력하세요.

질문은 그룹별로 나뉘어, 내 그룹이 받은 질문만 나옵니다. 전체 180개가 다 나오지는 않습니다.

이유

수백 개의 쌍을 혼자 답할 수는 없습니다. 각 쌍은 한 그룹에 갑니다. 의견이 갈린 쌍은 다른 그룹에 넘어가므로, 다른 곳에서 시작한 쌍이 나중에 내 목록에 나올 수 있습니다. 확정된 수에는 모든 그룹의 작업이 들어가므로, 내 목록이 줄어드는 것보다 빨리 늘어납니다.

확정 176 / 180 내가 답할 질문 0개

지난 집계: 결정 176 · 그룹 간 패널로 넘김 2 · 이견 있음 0 · 최소 인원 미달 2 — 패널마다 던진 표가 최소 max(2, 패널의 75%) 필요합니다. 가장 작은 패널의 멤버는 15명입니다.

닫기 ✕

Warnings were clear months before anyone acted → 영향을 주나? → Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible

아직 아무 말도 없습니다.

끝난 단계입니다. 쌍과 투표 기록은 위에 있습니다.논리 확인 ↗

What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	미결 넘김	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	미결	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	미결	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	미결 넘김	논의하기
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✓ 예	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✓ 예	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✓ 예	논의하기
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✓ 예	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✓ 예	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✓ 예	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✓ 예	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✓ 예	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✓ 예	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✓ 예	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✓ 예	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✓ 예	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✓ 예	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✓ 예	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✓ 예	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✓ 예	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ 아니요	논의하기
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ 아니요	논의하기
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ 아니요	보는 중 ↑ · 닫기 ✕
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ 아니요	논의하기