LA PREGUNTA
Why are mass crimes so rarely prosecuted?
¿Influye una significativamente en la otra? Deciden tres cuartas partes de los votos emitidos.
cerrada · volver a Acciones
Viendo como invitado. Escribe un nombre de usuario para unirte y participar.
Las preguntas se reparten entre los grupos, así que recibes las que le tocaron al tuyo — no las 180.
resueltas: 176 / 180 por responder: 0 por qué
Nadie podría responder varios cientos de pares. Cada par va a un grupo; un par que se divide se deriva después a otros grupos, así que puede aparecer más tarde en tu lista aunque empezara en otro sitio. La cifra de resueltas incluye el trabajo de todos los grupos, y por eso sube más rápido de lo que se acorta tu propia lista.
Último recuento: decididas: 176 · derivadas a paneles entre grupos: 2 · disputadas: 0 · sin quórum: 2 — los paneles necesitan al menos max(2, 75 % del panel) votos emitidos; tu panel más pequeño tiene 15 miembros.
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency → ¿influye en? → Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first
Nadie ha dicho nada aún.
Fase terminada — el registro de pares y votos queda arriba.Comprobar la lógica ↗
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | abierto derivado | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | abierto | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | abierto | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | abierto derivado | discutir |
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✓ sí | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✓ sí | discutir |
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✓ sí | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✓ sí | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✓ sí | en foco ↑ · cerrar ✕ |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✓ sí | discutir |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | ✓ sí | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✗ no | discutir |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | ✗ no | discutir |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✗ no | discutir |
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✗ no | discutir |
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✗ no | discutir |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✗ no | discutir |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✗ no | discutir |
| The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | By the time it is publishable it is history | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| So the safest position is a principle nobody applies | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | ✗ no | discutir |
| By the time it is publishable it is history | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✗ no | discutir |
| What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | → | The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war | ✗ no | discutir |
| A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency | → | Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | ✗ no | discutir |
| Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability | → | Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion | ✗ no | discutir |
| Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | ✗ no | discutir |
| The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided | → | Every state judges the case by what it costs them | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every state judges the case by what it costs them | → | What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin | ✗ no | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✗ no | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✗ no | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✗ no | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✗ no | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | ✗ no | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | ✗ no | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✗ no | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✗ no | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✗ no | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | ✗ no | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✗ no | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | ✗ no | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✗ no | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | ✗ no | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | ✗ no | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| Nobody was ever sacked for caution | → | Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✗ no | discutir |
| Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | ✗ no | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | ✗ no | discutir |
| The tools between words and troops were never built | → | An ambassador's career is not made by being early | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | Nobody was ever sacked for caution | ✗ no | discutir |
| An ambassador's career is not made by being early | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✗ no | discutir |
| Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation | → | Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible | ✗ no | discutir |
| Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | → | The tools between words and troops were never built | ✗ no | discutir |
| Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it | → | Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk | ✗ no | discutir |