THE QUESTION
Why are mass crimes so rarely prosecuted?
Spend your stickers on what matters most. An idea with evidence can take a held seat.
closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Your sticker budget
One per idea, 5 total. Floor is one vote.
5 places are held for overlooked ideas — nominate one with a link, and it counts once 2 people agree the source is relevant.
why
At stage close one nominee enters by random draw and the rest by nomination count, at most one per stakeholder class. A model checks only whether the page is about the same subject — never whether it proves the claim. That judgement is the room's, and a nomination nobody else stands behind takes no seat.
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion
Nothing said yet.
CLUSTER 1
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
13 votesdiscuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge
10 votesdiscuss
CLUSTER 2
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible
4 votesdiscuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk
4 votesdiscuss
NOT CLUSTERED
The veto exists because the alternative was no institution at all
0 votesdiscuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin
7 votesdiscuss
A state that acts alone is accused of the motives it may or may not have
0 votesdiscuss
By the time it is publishable it is history
2 votesdiscuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency
3 votesdiscuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
15 votesdiscuss
The instruction from the capital arrives late and hedged
0 votesdiscuss
The last intervention shapes what is possible for a decade
0 votesdiscuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it
4 votesdiscuss
Acting here and not there is used to discredit acting anywhere
1 votesdiscuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided
8 votesdiscuss
A state cannot commit forces to a place its public cannot find
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
0 votesdiscuss
There is no coverage without access and no access without consent
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
0 votesdiscuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution
3 votesdiscuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early
7 votesdiscuss
Sanctions relief has no mechanism, so they are never lifted
0 votes
↳ nominated for a seat: https://example.org/ops-incident-review.pdf could not read it (HTTPError) 1 of 2 behind it
discussNobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion
14 votesin focus ↑ · close ✕
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
3 votesdiscuss
Intelligence is compartmented and cannot be used publicly
0 votesdiscuss
The tools between words and troops were never built
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
8 votesdiscuss
Publishing evidence burns the source that produced it
0 votesdiscuss
The legal test is designed for a courtroom, not for a decision
0 votesdiscuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted
12 votesdiscuss
Support on this is traded for support on trade, or borders, or a seat
0 votesdiscussing (1)
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability
5 votesdiscuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first
5 votesdiscuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war
2 votesdiscuss
A ceasefire needs a guarantor and nobody volunteers
0 votesdiscuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished
14 votesdiscuss
Any council decision is a bargain about three other files
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
0 votesdiscuss