Structure · Why are mass crimes so rarely prosecuted?

THE QUESTION

Why are mass crimes so rarely prosecuted?

Does one significantly influence the other? Three quarters of the votes cast decide.

Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.

Questions are shared out between groups, so you get the ones your group was given — not all 180.

why

Nobody could answer several hundred pairs. Each pair goes to one group; a pair that splits is then referred to other groups, so it can appear in your list later even though it started elsewhere. The settled count includes every group's work, which is why it climbs faster than your own list shrinks.

176 / 180 settled 0 for you to answer

Last tally: 176 decided · 2 escalated to cross-group panels · 0 contested · 2 below quorum — panels need at least max(2, 75% of panel) votes cast; your smallest panel has 15 members.

close ✕

Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge → influences? → Warnings were clear months before anyone acted

Nothing said yet.

Completed phase — the record of pairs and votes stands above.Check the logic ↗

What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	open escalated	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	open	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	open	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	open escalated	discuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✓ yes	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✓ yes	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✓ yes	discuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✓ yes	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✓ yes	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✓ yes	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✓ yes	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✓ yes	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✓ yes	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✓ yes	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✓ yes	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✓ yes	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✓ yes	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✓ yes	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✓ yes	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✓ yes	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ no	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ no	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ no	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ no	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ no	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ no	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ no	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ no	discuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ no	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ no	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ no	discuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ no	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ no	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ no	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ no	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ no	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ no	discuss
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ no	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ no	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ no	discuss
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ no	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ no	discuss
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ no	discuss
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ no	discuss
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ no	discuss
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ no	discuss
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ no	discuss
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ no	discuss
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ no	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ no	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ no	discuss
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ no	discuss
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ no	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ no	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ no	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ no	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ no	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ no	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ no	discuss
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ no	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ no	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ no	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ no	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ no	in focus ↑ · close ✕
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ no	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ no	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ no	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ no	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ no	discuss
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ no	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ no	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ no	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ no	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ no	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ no	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ no	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ no	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ no	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ no	discuss
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ no	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ no	discuss
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ no	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ no	discuss
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ no	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ no	discuss
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ no	discuss
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ no	discuss
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ no	discuss
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ no	discuss