Strukturering · Why are mass crimes so rarely prosecuted?

SPØRGSMÅLET

Why are mass crimes so rarely prosecuted?

Har den ene væsentlig indflydelse på den anden? Tre fjerdedele af de afgivne stemmer afgør det.

Du ser med som gæst. Vælg et brugernavn for at komme med og deltage.

Spørgsmålene fordeles mellem grupperne, så du får dem, din gruppe fik tildelt — ikke alle 180.

hvorfor

Ingen kunne svare på flere hundrede par. Hvert par går til én gruppe; et par, der deler gruppen, sendes derefter videre til andre grupper, så det kan dukke op på din liste senere, selvom det startede et andet sted. Antallet af afgjorte tæller alle gruppers arbejde, og derfor stiger det hurtigere, end din egen liste skrumper.

176 / 180 afgjort 0 til dig at besvare

Seneste optælling: afgjort: 176 · sendt videre til tværgående paneler: 2 · omstridt: 0 · under kvorum: 2 — paneler skal have mindst max(2, 75 % af panelet) afgivne stemmer; dit mindste panel har 15 medlemmer.

luk ✕

Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk → påvirker? → Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible

Intet sagt endnu.

Afsluttet fase — historikken over par og stemmer står ovenfor.Tjek logikken ↗

What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	åben sendt videre	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	åben	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	åben	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	åben sendt videre	diskutér
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✓ ja	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✓ ja	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✓ ja	diskutér
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✓ ja	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✓ ja	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✓ ja	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✓ ja	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✓ ja	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✓ ja	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✓ ja	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✓ ja	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✓ ja	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✓ ja	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✓ ja	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✓ ja	i fokus ↑ · luk ✕
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✓ ja	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ nej	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ nej	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ nej	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ nej	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ nej	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ nej	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ nej	diskutér
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ nej	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ nej	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ nej	diskutér
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ nej	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ nej	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ nej	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ nej	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ nej	diskutér
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	By the time it is publishable it is history	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ nej	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	✗ nej	diskutér
By the time it is publishable it is history	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ nej	diskutér
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	→	The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war	✗ nej	diskutér
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic constituency	→	Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	✗ nej	diskutér
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability	→	Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion	✗ nej	diskutér
Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	✗ nej	diskutér
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided	→	Every state judges the case by what it costs them	✗ nej	diskutér
Every state judges the case by what it costs them	→	What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin	✗ nej	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ nej	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ nej	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ nej	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ nej	diskutér
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ nej	diskutér
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ nej	diskutér
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ nej	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ nej	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ nej	diskutér
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ nej	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ nej	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ nej	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ nej	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ nej	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ nej	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ nej	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ nej	diskutér
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ nej	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ nej	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ nej	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ nej	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody was ever sacked for caution	→	Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ nej	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ nej	diskutér
Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ nej	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	✗ nej	diskutér
The tools between words and troops were never built	→	An ambassador's career is not made by being early	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Consistency is impossible and inconsistency is the charge	✗ nej	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Nobody was ever sacked for caution	✗ nej	diskutér
An ambassador's career is not made by being early	→	Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ nej	diskutér
Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation	→	Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible	✗ nej	diskutér
Warnings were clear months before anyone acted	→	The tools between words and troops were never built	✗ nej	diskutér
Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it	→	Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk	✗ nej	diskutér