通行证 · 这个房间做了什么
Why does a steady life take more than it used to?
每一行都来自记录。这个页面上没有任何计算出来的内容，也没有任何修饰：分歧清单很短，说明房间达成了一致，而不是房间把分歧收拾掉了。
| 梳理的是 | 障碍 |
| 开启于 | 08 Sep 2026 |
| 回答者 | 30 人，分 2 个小组 · 参与者: 30 |
| 盲写 | 未记录 |
| 主张 | 写下 32 条，结构化 20 条 |
| 已认证的关联 | 27 |
| 这个问题上的房间 | 3 · 不计入共享地图 |
| 决定门槛 | 所投票数的 75% |
| 已封存 | 是，成员已被忘记 |
它的依据- A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us
- Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut
- The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place
- Every new rule consolidates the market a little more
- A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability
- Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage
预计随之而来的在地图定下之后撰写。没有人对其投票。
- Enforce payment terms on large buyers — 预期：a small firm can plan on being paid when it was promised — 到期：22 Jun 2027
房间会怎么做每项行动都对照每个根本原因进行判断，以所投票数的四分之三为准。
- Scale compliance to the size of the firm
不减轻任何根本原因 - Enforce payment terms on large buyers
减轻： A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us - Tax people and machines on the same basis
不减轻任何根本原因
← 返回对话