THE QUESTION
Why do atrocities go unpunished?
The causes, deepest first. Disagreements stay on the map.
closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
This room’s map
What this room certified, on its own — the numbers below count these. Left to right: deepest causes first; outlined green boxes are the roots. Only direct links are drawn — a link implied by a path is on the record, not in the picture. Dashed red is contested. Hover for full text.
How this dialogue measures
why
The indicators the method's own practitioners use to judge a dialogue's quality (Laouris & Metcalf 2024, Table 7), computed from this record so it can be compared with the hundreds of face-to-face and virtual dialogues behind their baselines. Spreadthink is the share of ideas that got at least one vote: 100% means everyone voted only for their own, and it usually settles to 25–45% once meaning has been shared. Situational complexity falls as more ideas are structured.
ideas (N)
37 usual: 50–100
37 usual: 50–100
with 1+ vote / 2+ votes
26 / 23
26 / 23
spreadthink
65.6% usual: 25–55
65.6% usual: 25–55
demosensus
34.4%
34.4%
clusters (dimensions)
3
3
cards in a cluster
16.2%
16.2%
structured / levels / links
20 / 3 / 10
20 / 3 / 10
situational complexity
0.52
0.52
minds moved
—
—
cards hidden by the steward
0
0
pairs contested
0
0
The merged map
Every room on this question is a walkthrough: this is a demonstration of the merge, not a finding.
Folded from 3 rooms on this question — 3 are walkthroughs, with stand-ins rather than people.
why
Every group built its own map from its own wall; these are folded into one. The same claim raised in two groups is one item, and each connection shows how many groups found it. Where groups found opposite things, that is published as a conflict.
Every room’s map folded into one. Dark, thick lines were certified by two or more rooms; grey dashed by one; dotted grey only by rooms that do not count; dashed red is a dispute. A green card with ×N is a claim N rooms raised on their own; the caption says so. Hover a link or a claim for the rooms behind it. — 1 link certified by two or more rooms · 0 contested · 39 links in all.
counted Why do atrocities go unpunis · steward trusted by this instance
counted Why do the people behind atr · steward trusted by this instance
counted Why are mass crimes so rarel · steward trusted by this instance
Dotted grey: a link certified only by rooms that do not count — shown, never a verdict. Hover a link for which rooms certified it and which said no; hover a claim for where it was raised and any evidence attached.
As a list — 39 links, graded by how many rooms found each; and 4 claims raised in more than one room
RAISED IN MORE THAN ONE ROOM
◆ The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided 3 rooms
◆ Warnings were clear months before anyone acted 3 rooms
◆ Every state judges the case by what it costs them 3 rooms
◆ Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished 3 rooms
EVERY LINK · solid and thicker: found by more rooms · dashed grey: one room
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished → Warnings were clear months before anyone acted 3 rooms
A minister will not spend capital on a country with no domestic consti → Sanctions are slow, blunt, and hurt the wrong people first 1 room
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished → Being from here is treated as a conflict of interest 1 room
Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished → Every proposal is heard as the beginning of an occupation 1 room
Balance is a property of coverage, not of what happened → We are asked to testify for a court and not asked what would have stop 1 room
Being from here is treated as a conflict of interest → Our own organisations are told they lack capacity 1 room
Coverage decides which crisis reaches a minister's desk → Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible 1 room
Domestic politics decides which suffering is legible → An ambassador's career is not made by being early 1 room
Early warning systems produce reports nobody is obliged to answer → Warnings were clear months before anyone acted 1 room
Every state judges the case by what it costs them → So the organisation that knows most says least 1 room
Every state judges the case by what it costs them → The people who decide have never met anyone from there 1 room
Every state judges the case by what it costs them → Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished 1 room
Justice is offered as a substitute for protection → Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished 1 room
Naming it triggers obligations, so it is not named → Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished 1 room
Nobody coordinated, so we relived it eleven times → The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided 1 room
Nobody coordinated, so we relived it eleven times → Being from here is treated as a conflict of interest 1 room
Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion → Every state judges the case by what it costs them 1 room
Nobody was ever sacked for caution → An ambassador's career is not made by being early 1 room
Nobody was ever sacked for caution → The tools between words and troops were never built 1 room
Nobody was ever sacked for caution → Reform of the veto requires the consent of those who hold it 1 room
Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability → So the safest position is a principle nobody applies 1 room
Our own organisations are told they lack capacity → Nobody came back to tell us what happened to what we sent 1 room
So the organisation that knows most says least → Every state judges the case by what it costs them 1 room
So the organisation that knows most says least → Each summary removes the part that would require action 1 room
So the organisation that knows most says least → Warnings were clear months before anyone acted 1 room
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies → By the time it is publishable it is history 1 room
So the safest position is a principle nobody applies → Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion 1 room
Speaking publicly ends the access that lets us feed people → Evidence is gathered for a trial that may happen in fifteen years 1 room
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war → Nobody offers the option between a statement and an invasion 1 room
The alternative to doing nothing is presented as full-scale war → Officials are advised that a wrong word creates liability 1 room
The people in danger are never in the room where it is decided → Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished 1 room
The people who decide have never met anyone from there → Balance is a property of coverage, not of what happened 1 room
The report was published in a language we do not read → Nobody came back to tell us what happened to what we sent 1 room
The same states arming a party also vote on protecting its victims → So warnings are hedged until they are unarguable, which is too late 1 room
We are asked to testify for a court and not asked what would have stop → A generation grows up in a place designed for six months 1 room
We were warned to be careful because the diaspora is emotional → Being from here is treated as a conflict of interest 1 room
We were warned to be careful because the diaspora is emotional → Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished 1 room
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin → Every state judges the case by what it costs them 1 room
What we know we cannot say and what we can say is thin → By the time it is publishable it is history 1 room
Connections several groups found (1 of 39)
| Acting early is politically costly and acting late is not punished | → | Warnings were clear months before anyone acted | 3 groups |