ПИТАЊЕ
Why does a lie travel further than the truth?
Да ли једно значајно утиче на друго? Одлучују три четвртине датих гласова.
затворено · назад на фазу Акције
Гледате као гост. Унесите корисничко име да бисте се придружили и учествовали.
Питања се расподељују између група, па добијате она која су дата вашој групи — не свих 162.
решено: 161 / 162 за ваш одговор: 0 зашто
Нико не би могао да одговори на неколико стотина парова. Сваки пар иде једној групи; пар на коме се панел подели затим се упућује другим групама, па може касније да се појави на вашем списку иако је почео негде другде. Број решених укључује рад свих група, зато расте брже него што се ваш списак смањује.
Последње пребројавање: решено: 161 · прослеђено панелима више група: 0 · спорно: 0 · испод кворума: 1 — панелима треба најмање max(2, 75% панела) датих гласова; ваш најмањи панел има 15 чланова.
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early → утиче на? → Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline
Још ништа није речено.
Завршена фаза — запис парова и гласова стоји изнад.Провери логику ↗
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | отворено | дискутуј |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✓ да | дискутуј |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ изведено | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ изведено | дискутуј |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | у фокусу ↑ · затвори ✕ |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ не | дискутуј |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ не | дискутуј |