ПИТАННЯ
Why does a lie travel further than the truth?
Чи суттєво одне впливає на інше? Вирішують три чверті поданих голосів.
закрито · назад до етапу Дії
Ви переглядаєте як гість. Введіть ім’я користувача, щоб приєднатися й брати участь.
Питання розподіляються між групами, тож ви отримуєте ті, що дісталися вашій групі, — а не всі 162.
вирішено: 161 / 162 чекають вашої відповіді: 0 чому
Ніхто не зміг би відповісти на кілька сотень пар. Кожна пара дістається одній групі; пару, у якій думки розділилися, потім передають іншим групам, тож вона може пізніше з’явитися у вашому списку, хоча почалася деінде. Кількість вирішених охоплює роботу всіх груп, тому вона росте швидше, ніж скорочується ваш список.
Останній підрахунок: вирішено: 161 · передано міжгруповим панелям: 0 · спірно: 0 · нижче кворуму: 1 — панелям потрібно щонайменше max(2, 75% панелі) поданих голосів; у вашій найменшій панелі 15 учасників.
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it → впливає на? → A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder
Ще нічого не сказано.
Етап завершено — запис пар і голосів наведено вище.Перевірити логіку ↗
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | відкрито | обговорити |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✓ так | обговорити |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✓ так | обговорити |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✓ так | обговорити |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ так | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✓ так | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✓ так | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✓ так | обговорити |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ виведено | обговорити |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ виведено | обговорити |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ ні | у фокусі ↑ · закрити ✕ |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ ні | обговорити |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ ні | обговорити |