问题
Why does a lie travel further than the truth?
一方是否显著影响另一方？达到所投票数的四分之三即为定论。
已关闭 · 返回行动阶段
正以访客身份查看。输入用户名即可加入并参与。
问题在各小组之间分配，所以你拿到的是分给你们小组的那些——不是全部 162 个。
已定 161 / 162 0 个待你回答 为什么
没有人能回答几百个卡片对。每个卡片对交给一个小组；意见分裂的卡片对会再转给其他小组，所以它可能稍后出现在你的列表中，即使它起初在别处。已定数量包括所有小组的工作，所以它增长得比你自己的列表缩短得快。
上次计票：161 个已定 · 0 个上交跨组评审组 · 0 个有争议 · 1 个未达法定人数 — 每个评审组至少需要 max(2, 评审组人数的 75%) 张票；你们最小的评审组有 15 名成员.
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised → 有影响？ → The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association
还没有人发言。
已完成的阶段——卡片对和投票的记录见上方。检查逻辑 ↗
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | 未定 | 讨论 |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✓ 是 | 讨论 |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ 推断 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✓ 推断 | 讨论 |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ 否 | 当前焦点 ↑ · 关闭 ✕ |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | → | A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | → | The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association | → | Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it | → | A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes | → | Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported | → | Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | → | There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | → | Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline | → | So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it | → | Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public | → | You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |
| You cannot check a claim whose data is not released | → | Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along | ✗ 否 | 讨论 |