LA DOMANDA
Why does a lie travel further than the truth?
Raggruppa le schede che ritieni simili. I raggruppamenti aiutano a leggere; non decidono nulla.
chiusa · torna alla fase Azioni
Stai guardando come ospite. Inserisci un nome utente per entrare e partecipare.
I raggruppamenti nascono dalla somiglianza, i nomi vengono per ultimi
Ordine canonico: collega coppie di idee che ritieni simili — i collegamenti sono simmetrici (A~B è B~A; la direzione non conta mai) e un legame vale quando lo fanno 2 membri.
perché
I collegamenti sono simmetrici — A~B è B~A. I raggruppamenti sono gli insiemi che emergono dai legami validi, e solo un raggruppamento già formato può ricevere un nome, da una persona. I tuoi collegamenti hanno una ✕ per ritirarli; non puoi togliere quelli degli altri. I raggruppamenti ordinano la bacheca e non limitano mai il voto — due schede che fanno la stessa AFFERMAZIONE vanno unite, nella fase Chiarimento.
Collegamenti e nomi si fanno mentre la fase Raggruppamento è aperta; la ← del facilitatore la riapre.
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it
Scope: the last two decades, not all history.
Ancora nessun intervento.
raggruppamento senza nome — dagli un nome se il gruppo ci vede un filo comune, o lascialo senza nome (2)
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all
~ Each revision is anno…Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along (14)
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along
~ Requests for data are…Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all (14)
raggruppamento senza nome — dagli un nome se il gruppo ci vede un filo comune, o lascialo senza nome (2)
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes
~ You cannot check a cl…You cannot check a claim whose data is not released (21)
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released
~ Once labelled, a clai…Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes (21)
raggruppamento senza nome — dagli un nome se il gruppo ci vede un filo comune, o lascialo senza nome (2)
The label 'misinformation' is applied to claims that later proved right
~ Nobody keeps a public…Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised (15)
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised
~ The label 'misinforma…The label 'misinformation' is applied to claims that later proved right (15)
raggruppamento senza nome — dagli un nome se il gruppo ci vede un filo comune, o lascialo senza nome (2)
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing
~ The inquiry reports a…The inquiry reports after everyone involved has retired (18)
The inquiry reports after everyone involved has retired
~ Institutions investig…Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing (18)
~ Platforms enforce the…Platforms enforce the label long after the institution has quietly moved (13)
raggruppamento senza nome — dagli un nome se il gruppo ci vede un filo comune, o lascialo senza nome (2)
Most of the people qualified to check are inside the system being checked
~ People who were punis…People who were punished for being early are never acknowledged (18)
People who were punished for being early are never acknowledged
~ Most of the people qu…Most of the people qualified to check are inside the system being checked (18)
raggruppamento senza nome — dagli un nome se il gruppo ci vede un filo comune, o lascialo senza nome (2)
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported
~ Being wrong in public…Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow (11)
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow
~ Guidance was stated m…Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported (11)
· non ancora raggruppata (23)
Trust falls further from the concealment than it ever would from the error
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline
Fraud is found by volunteers on the internet, years later
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable
The cost of dissent is paid by individuals and the benefit is public
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it
Replication is unfunded and therefore rare
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it
Platforms enforce the label long after the institution has quietly moved
~ A correction arrives …A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed (15)
~ The inquiry reports a…The inquiry reports after everyone involved has retired (13)
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed
~ Platforms enforce the…Platforms enforce the label long after the institution has quietly moved (15)
A career is ended by being right too soon
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association
The archive of the old guidance disappears from the website
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder
Journalists do not have the specialism to notice a quiet change
There is no mechanism to un-label a claim that turned out to be true
Nobody is compensated for having been correct
Reviewers are chosen from the same small group
The correction is technically public and effectively invisible
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance