True Causes
RU
Bahasa IndonesiaDanskDeutschEnglishEspañolFrançaisItalianoNederlandsNorskPolskiPortuguêsSrpski (latinica)SvenskaTiếng ViệtTürkçeΕλληνικάРусскийСрпски (ћирилица)Українська中文日本語한국어
← в начало
7/7 · Действия · просмотр: Структурирование
людей: 30 · идей: 35
нажмите на завершенный этап, чтобы посмотреть его
✓
Сбор
✓
Пояснение
✓
Группировка
✓
Отбор
✓
Структурирование
✓
Карта
7
Действия
пробный прогон · не учитывается
препятствия · любой, у кого есть ссылка · в открытом списке · федерация включена
ведущий: ее ведущий (запечатана)
людей: 30 · идей: 35 · 2 группы · 3 комнаты в федерации
Паспорт → · Логика → · протокол
↗ поделиться этой картой
На другом сайте, как живая карта:
Как изображение: https://truecauses.org/d/e74d06f/map.svg
Как данные: все оцененные пары в этой комнате (CSV). У каждого утверждения есть свой адрес, /c/e74d06f/<card>, он указан под картой.
Укажите источник при публикации: Causal map: True Causes, https://truecauses.org/d/e74d06f
ВОПРОС

Why does a lie travel further than the truth?

Существенно ли одно влияет на другое? Решают три четверти поданных голосов.

закрыто · назад к этапу «Действия»
Вы смотрите как гость. Введите имя пользователя, чтобы присоединиться и участвовать.
Вопросы распределяются между группами, поэтому вы получаете те, что достались вашей группе, — а не все 162.
почему
Никто не смог бы ответить на несколько сотен пар. Каждая пара достается одной группе; пара, по которой мнения разделились, затем передается другим группам, поэтому она может позже появиться в вашем списке, хотя началась в другом месте. Число решенных включает работу всех групп, поэтому оно растет быстрее, чем сокращается ваш список.
решено: 161 / 162 ждут вашего ответа: 0
Последний подсчет: решено: 161 · передано панелям из нескольких групп: 0 · спорно: 0 · ниже кворума: 1 — панелям нужно не меньше max(2, 75% панели) поданных голосов; в вашей самой маленькой панели 15 участников.
закрыть ✕
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed → влияет на? → Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all
Пока ничего не сказано.
Этап завершен — запись пар и голосов приведена выше.Проверить логику ↗
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishableоткрытообсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✓ даобсудить
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✓ даобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all✓ дав фокусе ↑ · закрыть ✕
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✓ даобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✓ даобсудить
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✓ даобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✓ даобсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✓ даобсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✓ даобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✓ даобсудить
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✓ даобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✓ даобсудить
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✓ даобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✓ даобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✓ даобсудить
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✓ выведенообсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✓ выведенообсудить
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes→A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it✗ нетобсудить
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it→Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes✗ нетобсудить
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes→Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised✗ нетобсудить
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association→Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association✗ нетобсудить
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all→A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it✗ нетобсудить
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised→The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it✗ нетобсудить
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes→The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all✗ нетобсудить
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes✗ нетобсудить
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association→A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it✗ нетобсудить
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association→Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all✗ нетобсудить
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised→Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all✗ нетобсудить
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it✗ нетобсудить
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all→Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised✗ нетобсудить
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all→The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association✗ нетобсудить
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association✗ нетобсудить
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised→Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all✗ нетобсудить
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all→Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes✗ нетобсудить
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes✗ нетобсудить
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes→Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised✗ нетобсудить
The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it→Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all✗ нетобсудить
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it→Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised✗ нетобсудить
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it→The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association✗ нетобсудить
Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised→A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Nobody keeps a public record of which official claims were later revised✗ нетобсудить
Requests for data are answered eighteen months later, if at all→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow→The bodies that issue guidance also fund those who check it✗ нетобсудить
The few outside are dismissed as cranks by association→Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes✗ нетобсудить
A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
A paper that contradicts the field is reviewed harder than one that confirms it→A correction arrives long after the decision it should have changed✗ нетобсудить
Once labelled, a claim cannot get a hearing even when the evidence changes→Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported✗ нетобсудить
Guidance was stated more confidently than the evidence supported→Being wrong in public costs an institution more than being slow✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✗ нетобсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable✗ нетобсудить
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✗ нетобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✗ нетобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✗ нетобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✗ нетобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✗ нетобсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✗ нетобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✗ нетобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✗ нетобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✗ нетобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable✗ нетобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✗ нетобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✗ нетобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable✗ нетобсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✗ нетобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public✗ нетобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable✗ нетобсудить
Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✗ нетобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✗ нетобсудить
There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✗ нетобсудить
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✗ нетобсудить
Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along→There is no body whose job is to be wrong-footed early✗ нетобсудить
A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✗ нетобсудить
A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder→Being unable to reproduce a result is not itself publishable✗ нетобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→A researcher who audits a funder's work loses the funder✗ нетобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→A genuine critic and a bad-faith one look identical from a distance✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline✗ нетобсудить
Peer review is three unpaid people on a deadline→So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it✗ нетобсудить
So institutions treat all criticism as one category and answer none of it→Institutions investigate themselves and find nothing✗ нетобсудить
The reply is that release would be misinterpreted by the public→You cannot check a claim whose data is not released✗ нетобсудить
You cannot check a claim whose data is not released→Each revision is announced as if it were the position all along✗ нетобсудить