THE QUESTION
What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable users well?
Spend your stickers on what matters most. An idea with evidence can take a held seat.
closed · back to Actions
Viewing as guest. Enter a handle to join and take part.
Your sticker budget
One per idea, 5 total. Floor is one vote.
5 places are held for overlooked ideas — nominate one with a link, and it counts once 2 people agree the source is relevant.
why
At stage close one nominee enters by random draw and the rest by nomination count, at most one per stakeholder class. A model checks only whether the page is about the same subject — never whether it proves the claim. That judgement is the room's, and a nomination nobody else stands behind takes no seat.
The driver would not be asked to guess which elderly rider needs extra time—the schedule would already include it.
Nothing said yet.
CLUSTER 1
Buses and fares work when you're in a rush.
Buses and fares only work when I’m not in a rush—when I need them, machines break or I’m out of cash.
1 votesdiscuss
Fares and top-up machines work every time, even when you’re rushing with no cash.
Fares and top-up machines always fail when I’m rushing and out of cash—never when I have time to wait.
2 votesdiscussing (1)
NOT CLUSTERED
The system would know who needs help before they arrive, not when they're standing at the train.
If the system worked, I'd see the need before the train arrives, not have to discover it when the passenger is standing at the platform.
4 votesdiscussing (4)
A passenger who didn't book a ramp still gets met at the platform, not turned away.
Even when a passenger hasn't booked, I should still be able to meet them with a ramp, not have to turn them away because it's not in the system.
3 votesdiscuss
A ramp request that's not in the system still gets approved on the spot, without a supervisor's sign-off.
I should be able to approve a ramp request on the spot myself, even if it's not booked, without needing a supervisor's sign-off.
4 votesdiscussing (1)
The timetable would give extra time at stops the elderly regulars need, as seen from the bus.
The timetable already marks extra stop time for elderly regulars, but on the route it often doesn’t happen.
1 votesdiscussing (1)
The driver could pull over safely at a bus stop if an elderly rider needed extra time without rushing them or missing the next stop.
If an elderly rider needs extra time at a stop, I could pull over safely at that stop without rushing or missing the next stop.
1 votesdiscuss
The driver would not be asked to guess which elderly rider needs extra time—the schedule would already include it.
0 votesin focus ↑ · close ✕
It would be available and reliable.
I meant the system would consistently be operational and free of long-standing issues.
0 votesdiscuss
The system would have a clear and public explanation of the reasons behind any service disruptions or changes.
I meant the system would explain the cause of disruptions in a way that's accessible to everyone.
0 votesdiscuss
The system would allow real-time information about delays and disruptions in multiple languages, not just the ones they already speak.
I meant the system would provide real-time information in languages spoken by the passengers, not just my own.
2 votesdiscuss
Funding would be consistent and predictable.
1 votesdiscussing (1)
Elected officials prioritize its funding.
1 votesdiscuss
It would be easy to use for people with disabilities.
0 votesdiscuss
Staff are trained to assist users politely and patiently.
0 votesdiscuss
Wheelchair spaces are reserved and protected from other passengers.
1 votesdiscuss
The night bus comes when it says, and I know it without a phone.
If the timetable says 2:10, the bus comes at 2:10 and there is a printed sheet at the stop telling me so, because I can't be refreshing an app in the dark to know whether to wait another hour or start walking.
4 votesdiscussing (1)
There would be a way to complain that I was told about in a language I understand.
There should be a way to report a missed bus or a broken light that someone explains to me face to face, in my own language, instead of a website nobody has ever told me exists.
2 votesdiscuss
Assistance would always be where it says it will be, when it says it will be, in the app.
I should be able to rely on the app's confirmation of assistance, so I don't have to worry about being stranded.
1 votesdiscussing (1)
Staff would greet me by name and know my usual route.
Staff who know me and my routine would make my journey feel safer and more comfortable.
0 votesdiscuss
The system would check in by phone if I'm not at the bus stop a minute before the bus arrives, to see if I need more time.
A quick phone call would help ensure I'm not left behind if I need a bit more time to get to the bus stop.
0 votesdiscuss
Buses should be accessible to all who need them.
Accessibility for all, including those who use wheelchairs, should be a priority in our transportation system.
1 votesdiscuss
Buses would arrive on time, so I don't have to choose between spending on ramps or buses.
If buses ran on time consistently, we wouldn't have to make a choice between investing in accessibility features or maintaining service frequency.
2 votesdiscuss
Ramps would be available without needing to book them in advance.
Ramps should be universally available and not require advance booking to ensure ease of use for all passengers.
2 votesdiscuss
Fares have a backup cash option when machines fail, always available.
1 votesdiscuss
It would not exclude people with disabilities or low incomes.
The system excludes people with disabilities and low incomes because we ignore the barriers they report in complaints.
0 votesdiscuss
All staff receive regular training in disability awareness and inclusive customer service for vulnerable passengers.
Staff take the training but still fail vulnerable passengers, as the complaints I log show.
2 votesdiscuss
The system tracks repeated complaints about a stop or route and fixes the problem before more people are affected.
We track repeated complaints but don't fix the problems, so more people are affected every day.
2 votesdiscussing (1)
Good shelters for waiting at stops would be a key feature.
Shelters at stops would make waiting easier for customers, especially those with children or disabilities.
1 votesdiscuss
Customers would receive consistent route information and updates.
0 votesdiscuss
Souped-up 911-style phones at every stop for those in a rush or with urgent needs.
0 votesdiscuss
Staff would be trained to recognize and respond to different disabilities.
I mean that all staff should be properly trained to identify and assist riders with various disabilities effectively.
0 votesdiscuss
The system would have a dedicated, easily accessible feedback mechanism for riders with disabilities to report issues and suggest improvements.
0 votesdiscuss
Bus routes would include late-night services to safe stops.
Late-night stops would have visible security cameras and well-lit areas to ensure safety.
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.