DIE FRAGE
What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable users well?
Vergeben Sie Ihre Klebepunkte an das, was am wichtigsten ist. Eine Idee mit Beleg kann einen reservierten Platz bekommen.
geschlossen · zurück zu Maßnahmen
Ansicht als Gast. Benutzernamen eingeben, um beizutreten und mitzumachen.
Ihr Klebepunkt-Budget
Einer pro Idee, insgesamt 5. Mindestens eine Stimme.
Reservierte Plätze für übersehene Ideen: 5 — nominieren Sie eine mit Link; sie zählt, sobald 2 Personen zustimmen, dass die Quelle relevant ist.
warum
Am Ende der Phase kommt eine nominierte Idee per Los hinein und die übrigen nach Zahl der Nominierungen, höchstens eine pro Interessengruppe. Ein Modell prüft nur, ob die Seite dasselbe Thema behandelt — nie, ob sie die Behauptung beweist. Dieses Urteil liegt beim Raum, und eine Nominierung, hinter der sonst niemand steht, bekommt keinen Platz.
Funding would be consistent and predictable.
My first choice, consistent and predictable funding, matters because I've seen how the political appetite for spending shifts with headlines, leading to funding swings that nobody in the depot understands, and it's crucial for the stability and effectiveness of our transportation system.
farbig hinterlegt — die Person, die die Karte geschrieben hat
BÜNDEL 1
Buses and fares work when you're in a rush.
Buses and fares only work when I’m not in a rush—when I need them, machines break or I’m out of cash.
Stimmen: 1diskutieren
Fares and top-up machines work every time, even when you’re rushing with no cash.
Fares and top-up machines always fail when I’m rushing and out of cash—never when I have time to wait.
Stimmen: 2in Diskussion (1)
NICHT GEBÜNDELT
The system would know who needs help before they arrive, not when they're standing at the train.
If the system worked, I'd see the need before the train arrives, not have to discover it when the passenger is standing at the platform.
Stimmen: 4in Diskussion (4)
A passenger who didn't book a ramp still gets met at the platform, not turned away.
Even when a passenger hasn't booked, I should still be able to meet them with a ramp, not have to turn them away because it's not in the system.
Stimmen: 3diskutieren
A ramp request that's not in the system still gets approved on the spot, without a supervisor's sign-off.
I should be able to approve a ramp request on the spot myself, even if it's not booked, without needing a supervisor's sign-off.
Stimmen: 4in Diskussion (1)
The timetable would give extra time at stops the elderly regulars need, as seen from the bus.
The timetable already marks extra stop time for elderly regulars, but on the route it often doesn’t happen.
Stimmen: 1in Diskussion (1)
The driver could pull over safely at a bus stop if an elderly rider needed extra time without rushing them or missing the next stop.
If an elderly rider needs extra time at a stop, I could pull over safely at that stop without rushing or missing the next stop.
Stimmen: 1diskutieren
The driver would not be asked to guess which elderly rider needs extra time—the schedule would already include it.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
It would be available and reliable.
I meant the system would consistently be operational and free of long-standing issues.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
The system would have a clear and public explanation of the reasons behind any service disruptions or changes.
I meant the system would explain the cause of disruptions in a way that's accessible to everyone.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
The system would allow real-time information about delays and disruptions in multiple languages, not just the ones they already speak.
I meant the system would provide real-time information in languages spoken by the passengers, not just my own.
Stimmen: 2diskutieren
Funding would be consistent and predictable.
Stimmen: 1im Fokus ↑ · schließen ✕
Elected officials prioritize its funding.
Stimmen: 1diskutieren
It would be easy to use for people with disabilities.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
Staff are trained to assist users politely and patiently.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
Wheelchair spaces are reserved and protected from other passengers.
Stimmen: 1diskutieren
The night bus comes when it says, and I know it without a phone.
If the timetable says 2:10, the bus comes at 2:10 and there is a printed sheet at the stop telling me so, because I can't be refreshing an app in the dark to know whether to wait another hour or start walking.
Stimmen: 4in Diskussion (1)
There would be a way to complain that I was told about in a language I understand.
There should be a way to report a missed bus or a broken light that someone explains to me face to face, in my own language, instead of a website nobody has ever told me exists.
Stimmen: 2diskutieren
Assistance would always be where it says it will be, when it says it will be, in the app.
I should be able to rely on the app's confirmation of assistance, so I don't have to worry about being stranded.
Stimmen: 1in Diskussion (1)
Staff would greet me by name and know my usual route.
Staff who know me and my routine would make my journey feel safer and more comfortable.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
The system would check in by phone if I'm not at the bus stop a minute before the bus arrives, to see if I need more time.
A quick phone call would help ensure I'm not left behind if I need a bit more time to get to the bus stop.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
Buses should be accessible to all who need them.
Accessibility for all, including those who use wheelchairs, should be a priority in our transportation system.
Stimmen: 1diskutieren
Buses would arrive on time, so I don't have to choose between spending on ramps or buses.
If buses ran on time consistently, we wouldn't have to make a choice between investing in accessibility features or maintaining service frequency.
Stimmen: 2diskutieren
Ramps would be available without needing to book them in advance.
Ramps should be universally available and not require advance booking to ensure ease of use for all passengers.
Stimmen: 2diskutieren
Fares have a backup cash option when machines fail, always available.
Stimmen: 1diskutieren
It would not exclude people with disabilities or low incomes.
The system excludes people with disabilities and low incomes because we ignore the barriers they report in complaints.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
All staff receive regular training in disability awareness and inclusive customer service for vulnerable passengers.
Staff take the training but still fail vulnerable passengers, as the complaints I log show.
Stimmen: 2diskutieren
The system tracks repeated complaints about a stop or route and fixes the problem before more people are affected.
We track repeated complaints but don't fix the problems, so more people are affected every day.
Stimmen: 2in Diskussion (1)
Good shelters for waiting at stops would be a key feature.
Shelters at stops would make waiting easier for customers, especially those with children or disabilities.
Stimmen: 1diskutieren
Customers would receive consistent route information and updates.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
Souped-up 911-style phones at every stop for those in a rush or with urgent needs.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
Staff would be trained to recognize and respond to different disabilities.
I mean that all staff should be properly trained to identify and assist riders with various disabilities effectively.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
The system would have a dedicated, easily accessible feedback mechanism for riders with disabilities to report issues and suggest improvements.
Stimmen: 0diskutieren
Bus routes would include late-night services to safe stops.
Late-night stops would have visible security cameras and well-lit areas to ensure safety.
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.