DE VRAAG
What would be true of a public transport system that served its most vulnerable users well?
Zeg wat je bedoelde. Twee kaartjes worden alleen samengevoegd als beide schrijvers instemmen.
gesloten · terug naar Acties
Je kijkt mee als gast. Kies een gebruikersnaam om mee te doen.
Dubbele kaartjes samenvoegen
Alleen voor twee kaartjes die dezelfde bewering doen.
waarom
Samenvoegen gebeurt alleen als beide schrijvers instemmen. Bespreek de betekenis in de zijchat van het kaartje voordat je iets samenvoegt.
in afwachting "Buses would arrive on time, so…" → "Elected officials prioritize i…"
in afwachting "A passenger who didn't book a …" → "Customers would receive consis…"
samengevoegd "Signs and spoken announcements…" → "The system would allow real-ti…"
in afwachting "The driver would not be asked …" → "The system would check in by p…"
in afwachting "It would be available and reli…" → "Assistance would always be whe…"
in afwachting "The night bus comes when it sa…" → "The timetable would give extra…"
in afwachting "The system would know who need…" → "Good shelters for waiting at s…"
in afwachting "It would be available and reli…" → "It would be reliable.…"
samengevoegd "All stops and vehicles would b…" → "Buses should be accessible to …"
in afwachting "It would be easy to use for pe…" → "Ramps would be available witho…"
samengevoegd "It would be reliable.…" → "Assistance would always be whe…"
in afwachting "A ramp request that's not in t…" → "Souped-up 911-style phones at …"
It would not exclude people with disabilities or low incomes.
The system excludes people with disabilities and low incomes because we ignore the barriers they report in complaints.
Nog niets gezegd.
The system would know who needs help before they arrive, not when they're standing at the train.
If the system worked, I'd see the need before the train arrives, not have to discover it when the passenger is standing at the platform.
A passenger who didn't book a ramp still gets met at the platform, not turned away.
Even when a passenger hasn't booked, I should still be able to meet them with a ramp, not have to turn them away because it's not in the system.
A ramp request that's not in the system still gets approved on the spot, without a supervisor's sign-off.
I should be able to approve a ramp request on the spot myself, even if it's not booked, without needing a supervisor's sign-off.
The timetable would give extra time at stops the elderly regulars need, as seen from the bus.
The timetable already marks extra stop time for elderly regulars, but on the route it often doesn’t happen.
The driver could pull over safely at a bus stop if an elderly rider needed extra time without rushing them or missing the next stop.
If an elderly rider needs extra time at a stop, I could pull over safely at that stop without rushing or missing the next stop.
The driver would not be asked to guess which elderly rider needs extra time—the schedule would already include it.
It would be available and reliable.
I meant the system would consistently be operational and free of long-standing issues.
The system would have a clear and public explanation of the reasons behind any service disruptions or changes.
I meant the system would explain the cause of disruptions in a way that's accessible to everyone.
The system would allow real-time information about delays and disruptions in multiple languages, not just the ones they already speak.
I meant the system would provide real-time information in languages spoken by the passengers, not just my own.
Funding would be consistent and predictable.
Elected officials prioritize its funding.
It would be easy to use for people with disabilities.
Staff are trained to assist users politely and patiently.
Wheelchair spaces are reserved and protected from other passengers.
The night bus comes when it says, and I know it without a phone.
If the timetable says 2:10, the bus comes at 2:10 and there is a printed sheet at the stop telling me so, because I can't be refreshing an app in the dark to know whether to wait another hour or start walking.
There would be a way to complain that I was told about in a language I understand.
There should be a way to report a missed bus or a broken light that someone explains to me face to face, in my own language, instead of a website nobody has ever told me exists.
Assistance would always be where it says it will be, when it says it will be, in the app.
I should be able to rely on the app's confirmation of assistance, so I don't have to worry about being stranded.
Staff would greet me by name and know my usual route.
Staff who know me and my routine would make my journey feel safer and more comfortable.
The system would check in by phone if I'm not at the bus stop a minute before the bus arrives, to see if I need more time.
A quick phone call would help ensure I'm not left behind if I need a bit more time to get to the bus stop.
Buses should be accessible to all who need them.
Accessibility for all, including those who use wheelchairs, should be a priority in our transportation system.
Buses would arrive on time, so I don't have to choose between spending on ramps or buses.
If buses ran on time consistently, we wouldn't have to make a choice between investing in accessibility features or maintaining service frequency.
Ramps would be available without needing to book them in advance.
Ramps should be universally available and not require advance booking to ensure ease of use for all passengers.
Buses and fares work when you're in a rush.
Buses and fares only work when I’m not in a rush—when I need them, machines break or I’m out of cash.
cluster 1bespreken
Fares and top-up machines work every time, even when you’re rushing with no cash.
Fares and top-up machines always fail when I’m rushing and out of cash—never when I have time to wait.
cluster 1bespreken
Fares have a backup cash option when machines fail, always available.
It would not exclude people with disabilities or low incomes.
The system excludes people with disabilities and low incomes because we ignore the barriers they report in complaints.
All staff receive regular training in disability awareness and inclusive customer service for vulnerable passengers.
Staff take the training but still fail vulnerable passengers, as the complaints I log show.
The system tracks repeated complaints about a stop or route and fixes the problem before more people are affected.
We track repeated complaints but don't fix the problems, so more people are affected every day.
Good shelters for waiting at stops would be a key feature.
Shelters at stops would make waiting easier for customers, especially those with children or disabilities.
Customers would receive consistent route information and updates.
Souped-up 911-style phones at every stop for those in a rush or with urgent needs.
Staff would be trained to recognize and respond to different disabilities.
I mean that all staff should be properly trained to identify and assist riders with various disabilities effectively.
The system would have a dedicated, easily accessible feedback mechanism for riders with disabilities to report issues and suggest improvements.
Bus routes would include late-night services to safe stops.
uit andere ruimtesbespreken
Late-night stops would have visible security cameras and well-lit areas to ensure safety.
uit andere ruimtesbespreken
The whole journey—stop, bus, route—would feel the same every single time, so my son knows what's coming.
uit andere ruimtesbespreken
Every region meets the same accessibility standards, without exceptions.
uit andere ruimtesbespreken
When you file a complaint, someone calls you back with a fix, not just a case number.
uit andere ruimtesbespreken