Strukturering · Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

SPØRGSMÅLET

Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

Har den ene væsentlig indflydelse på den anden? Tre fjerdedele af de afgivne stemmer afgør det.

Du ser med som gæst. Vælg et brugernavn for at komme med og deltage.

Spørgsmålene fordeles mellem grupperne, så du får dem, din gruppe fik tildelt — ikke alle 180.

hvorfor

Ingen kunne svare på flere hundrede par. Hvert par går til én gruppe; et par, der deler gruppen, sendes derefter videre til andre grupper, så det kan dukke op på din liste senere, selvom det startede et andet sted. Antallet af afgjorte tæller alle gruppers arbejde, og derfor stiger det hurtigere, end din egen liste skrumper.

178 / 180 afgjort 0 til dig at besvare

Seneste optælling: afgjort: 178 · sendt videre til tværgående paneler: 0 · omstridt: 0 · under kvorum: 2 — paneler skal have mindst max(2, 75 % af panelet) afgivne stemmer; dit mindste panel har 15 medlemmer.

luk ✕

Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages → påvirker? → Every new rule consolidates the market a little more

Intet sagt endnu.

Afsluttet fase — historikken over par og stemmer står ovenfor.Tjek logikken ↗

Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	åben	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	åben	diskutér
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✓ ja	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ ja	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ ja	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ ja	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✓ ja	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ ja	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ ja	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ ja	diskutér
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✓ ja	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ ja	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ ja	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ ja	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ ja	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ ja	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ ja	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ ja	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ ja	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✓ ja	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✓ ja	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✓ ja	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ ja	diskutér
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ ja	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ ja	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✓ ja	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ udledt	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ udledt	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ udledt	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nej	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nej	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nej	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nej	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nej	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nej	i fokus ↑ · luk ✕
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nej	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nej	diskutér
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nej	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nej	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nej	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nej	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nej	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nej	diskutér
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nej	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nej	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nej	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nej	diskutér
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nej	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nej	diskutér
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nej	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nej	diskutér
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nej	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nej	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nej	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nej	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nej	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nej	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nej	diskutér
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nej	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nej	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nej	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nej	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nej	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nej	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nej	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nej	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nej	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nej	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nej	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nej	diskutér
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nej	diskutér
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nej	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nej	diskutér
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nej	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nej	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nej	diskutér
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nej	diskutér
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nej	diskutér
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nej	diskutér
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nej	diskutér
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nej	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nej	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nej	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nej	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nej	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nej	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nej	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nej	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nej	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nej	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nej	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nej	diskutér
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nej	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nej	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nej	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nej	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nej	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nej	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nej	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nej	diskutér
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nej	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nej	diskutér
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nej	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nej	diskutér
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nej	diskutér
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nej	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nej	diskutér
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nej	diskutér
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	…	✗ nej	diskutér
…	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nej	diskutér
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nej	diskutér
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nej	diskutér