Cấu trúc · Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

CÂU HỎI

Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

Liệu cái này có ảnh hưởng đáng kể đến cái kia không? Ba phần tư số phiếu đã bỏ sẽ quyết định.

Đang xem với tư cách khách. Nhập tên người dùng để vào và tham gia.

Các câu hỏi được chia cho các nhóm, nên bạn nhận những câu được giao cho nhóm mình — không phải cả 180 câu.

vì sao

Không ai trả lời nổi vài trăm cặp thẻ. Mỗi cặp được giao cho một nhóm; cặp nào bị chia rẽ sẽ được chuyển sang các nhóm khác, nên nó có thể xuất hiện trong danh sách của bạn sau này dù bắt đầu ở nơi khác. Số đã ngã ngũ tính cả công việc của mọi nhóm, vì vậy nó tăng nhanh hơn tốc độ danh sách của bạn ngắn lại.

178 / 180 đã ngã ngũ 0 câu chờ bạn trả lời

Lần kiểm phiếu gần nhất: 178 đã quyết · 0 chuyển lên hội đồng liên nhóm · 0 còn tranh cãi · 2 chưa đủ số người tối thiểu — hội đồng cần ít nhất max(2, 75% hội đồng) phiếu đã bỏ; hội đồng nhỏ nhất của bạn có 15 thành viên.

đóng ✕

The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever → ảnh hưởng? → So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills

Chưa ai nói gì.

Giai đoạn đã xong — hồ sơ các cặp thẻ và phiếu bầu nằm ở trên.Kiểm tra lập luận ↗

Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	đang mở	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	đang mở	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✓ có	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ có	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ có	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ có	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✓ có	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ có	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ có	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ có	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✓ có	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ có	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ có	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ có	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ có	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ có	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ có	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ có	đang mở ↑ · đóng ✕
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ có	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✓ có	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✓ có	thảo luận
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✓ có	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ có	thảo luận
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ có	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ có	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✓ có	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ suy ra	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ suy ra	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ suy ra	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ không	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ không	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ không	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ không	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ không	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ không	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ không	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ không	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ không	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ không	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ không	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ không	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ không	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ không	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ không	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ không	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ không	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ không	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ không	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ không	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ không	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ không	thảo luận
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ không	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ không	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ không	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ không	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ không	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ không	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ không	thảo luận
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ không	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ không	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ không	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ không	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ không	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ không	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ không	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ không	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ không	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ không	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ không	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ không	thảo luận
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ không	thảo luận
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ không	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ không	thảo luận
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ không	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ không	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ không	thảo luận
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ không	thảo luận
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ không	thảo luận
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ không	thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ không	thảo luận
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ không	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ không	thảo luận
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ không	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ không	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ không	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ không	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ không	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ không	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ không	thảo luận
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ không	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ không	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ không	thảo luận
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ không	thảo luận
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ không	thảo luận
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ không	thảo luận
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ không	thảo luận
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ không	thảo luận
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ không	thảo luận
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ không	thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ không	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ không	thảo luận
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ không	thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	…	✗ không	thảo luận
…	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ không	thảo luận
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ không	thảo luận
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ không	thảo luận