CÂU HỎI
Why does a steady life take more than it used to?
Nói rõ ý bạn. Hai thẻ chỉ được gộp nếu cả hai tác giả đồng ý.
đã đóng · quay lại giai đoạn Biện pháp
Đang xem với tư cách khách. Nhập tên người dùng để vào và tham gia.
Gộp thẻ trùng
Chỉ dành cho hai thẻ nêu cùng một nhận định.
vì sao
Chỉ gộp khi cả hai tác giả đồng ý. Hãy bàn về ý nghĩa trong phần thảo luận của thẻ trước khi gộp bất cứ thứ gì.
đã gộp "Nobody trains anyone, and then…" → "So nobody trains and everyone …"
We train people and a larger firm hires them at more
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
Chưa ai nói gì.
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place
Automation is subsidised through the tax code and hiring is not
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
The apprenticeship system is designed for firms with an HR department
The chain that replaced the shop pays less and takes the money out of town
We would take the risk on a person if the risk were shared
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not
One large buyer sets our margin and our payment terms
We are the ones who see it and nobody asks us anything
Compliance costs the same for nine employees as for nine hundred
cụm 2thảo luận
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever
cụm 1thảo luận
We are paid in ninety days and pay wages in thirty
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
The customer chooses on price and always has
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
cụm 2thảo luận
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts
cụm 1thảo luận
A single wage no longer supports a household
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages
The policies are written for a company with a government affairs team
We train people and a larger firm hires them at more
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours
Agencies take a margin for work we used to do ourselves
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.