问题
Why does a steady life take more than it used to?
把你的贴纸用在最重要的内容上。有证据支持的想法可以占用一个保留席位。
已关闭 · 返回行动阶段
正以访客身份查看。输入用户名即可加入并参与。
你的贴纸额度
每个想法最多一张，共 5 张。至少投一票。
有 5 个席位为被忽视的想法保留——附上链接提名一个，当 2 人认同来源相关时就会计入。
为什么
阶段结束时，一名被提名者通过随机抽签入选，其余按提名数入选，每个利益相关方类别最多一个。模型只检查页面是否关于同一主题——从不检查它是否证明了这个主张。那要由房间来判断；没有其他人支持的提名不能占用席位。
We train people and a larger firm hires them at more
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
还没有人发言。
类别 1
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever
12 票讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts
6 票讨论
类别 2
Compliance costs the same for nine employees as for nine hundred
0 票讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
6 票讨论中（1）
未归类
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades
12 票讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
3 票讨论中（1）
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
4 票讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place
1 票讨论
Automation is subsidised through the tax code and hiring is not
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
0 票讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut
Narrower than it reads — the wider claim is someone else's card.
3 票讨论
The apprenticeship system is designed for firms with an HR department
1 票讨论
The chain that replaced the shop pays less and takes the money out of town
1 票讨论
We would take the risk on a person if the risk were shared
0 票讨论中（1）
We would pay more if the work carried the price
Meaning the general pattern, not one case.
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not
3 票讨论
One large buyer sets our margin and our payment terms
0 票讨论
We are the ones who see it and nobody asks us anything
1 票讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills
11 票讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage
14 票讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired
14 票讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll
1 票讨论
We are paid in ninety days and pay wages in thirty
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
1 票讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses
To be precise: this is about the mechanism, not anyone's motives.
3 票讨论
The customer chooses on price and always has
0 票讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household
15 票讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages
6 票讨论
The policies are written for a company with a government affairs team
2 票讨论
We train people and a larger firm hires them at more
Not an accusation: an institution can do this with everyone acting in good faith.
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
3 票讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours
1 票讨论
Agencies take a margin for work we used to do ourselves
I mean this as an observation; I would want it tested.
1 票讨论