構造化 · Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

問い

Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

一方は他方に大きく影響しますか？投じられた票の4分の3で決まります。

ゲストとして閲覧中。参加するにはユーザー名を入力してください。

問いはグループに分配されるので、あなたに届くのは自分のグループに割り当てられたものだけです（全180件ではありません）。

理由

数百ものペアに答えられる人はいません。各ペアは一つのグループに渡され、意見が割れたペアは他のグループに回されます。そのため、別のところで始まったペアが後からあなたの一覧に現れることがあります。決着の数にはすべてのグループの作業が含まれるので、自分の一覧が減るより速く増えていきます。

決着 178/180 あなたの回答待ち：0

前回の集計：決着 178 · グループ横断パネルへ回付 0 · 争いあり 0 · 定足数未満 2 — パネルには max(2, パネルの75%) 以上の票が必要です。最小のパネルのメンバーは15人です.

閉じる ✕

Assets rose faster than wages for four decades → 影響する？ → A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability

まだ発言はありません。

完了した段階です。ペアと投票の記録は上にあります。論理を確かめる ↗

Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	未決	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	未決	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✓ はい	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ はい	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ はい	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ はい	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✓ はい	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ はい	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ はい	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ はい	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✓ はい	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ はい	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ はい	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ はい	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ はい	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ はい	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ はい	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ はい	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ はい	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✓ はい	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✓ はい	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✓ はい	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ はい	議論する
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ はい	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ はい	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✓ はい	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ 推論	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ 推論	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ 推論	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ いいえ	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ いいえ	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ いいえ	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ いいえ	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ いいえ	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ いいえ	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ いいえ	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ いいえ	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ いいえ	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ いいえ	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ いいえ	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ いいえ	議論する
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ いいえ	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ いいえ	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ いいえ	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ いいえ	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ いいえ	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ いいえ	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ いいえ	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ いいえ	議論する
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ いいえ	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ いいえ	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ いいえ	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ いいえ	議論する
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ いいえ	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ いいえ	議論する
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ いいえ	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ いいえ	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ いいえ	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ いいえ	議論する
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ いいえ	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ いいえ	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ いいえ	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ いいえ	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ いいえ	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ いいえ	議論する
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ いいえ	議論する
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ いいえ	表示中 ↑ · 閉じる ✕
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ いいえ	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ いいえ	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ いいえ	議論する
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ いいえ	議論する
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ いいえ	議論する
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ いいえ	議論する
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ いいえ	議論する
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ いいえ	議論する
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ いいえ	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ いいえ	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ いいえ	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ いいえ	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ いいえ	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ いいえ	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ いいえ	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ いいえ	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ いいえ	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ いいえ	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ いいえ	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ いいえ	議論する
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ いいえ	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ いいえ	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ いいえ	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ いいえ	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ いいえ	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ いいえ	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ いいえ	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ いいえ	議論する
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ いいえ	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ いいえ	議論する
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ いいえ	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ いいえ	議論する
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ いいえ	議論する
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ いいえ	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ いいえ	議論する
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ いいえ	議論する
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	…	✗ いいえ	議論する
…	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ いいえ	議論する
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ いいえ	議論する
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ いいえ	議論する