구조 잡기 · Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

질문

Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

한쪽이 다른 쪽에 크게 영향을 줍니까? 던진 표의 4분의 3으로 정합니다.

게스트로 보는 중. 참여하려면 닉네임을 입력하세요.

질문은 그룹별로 나뉘어, 내 그룹이 받은 질문만 나옵니다. 전체 180개가 다 나오지는 않습니다.

이유

수백 개의 쌍을 혼자 답할 수는 없습니다. 각 쌍은 한 그룹에 갑니다. 의견이 갈린 쌍은 다른 그룹에 넘어가므로, 다른 곳에서 시작한 쌍이 나중에 내 목록에 나올 수 있습니다. 확정된 수에는 모든 그룹의 작업이 들어가므로, 내 목록이 줄어드는 것보다 빨리 늘어납니다.

확정 178 / 180 내가 답할 질문 0개

지난 집계: 결정 178 · 그룹 간 패널로 넘김 0 · 이견 있음 0 · 최소 인원 미달 2 — 패널마다 던진 표가 최소 max(2, 패널의 75%) 필요합니다. 가장 작은 패널의 멤버는 15명입니다.

닫기 ✕

Assets rose faster than wages for four decades → 영향을 주나? → A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us

아직 아무 말도 없습니다.

끝난 단계입니다. 쌍과 투표 기록은 위에 있습니다.논리 확인 ↗

Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	미결	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	미결	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✓ 예	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ 예	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ 예	논의하기
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ 예	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✓ 예	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ 예	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ 예	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ 예	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✓ 예	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ 예	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ 예	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ 예	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ 예	논의하기
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ 예	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ 예	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ 예	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ 예	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✓ 예	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✓ 예	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✓ 예	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ 예	논의하기
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ 예	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ 예	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✓ 예	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ 추론됨	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ 추론됨	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ 추론됨	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	보는 중 ↑ · 닫기 ✕
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 아니요	논의하기
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 아니요	논의하기
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 아니요	논의하기
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 아니요	논의하기
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	…	✗ 아니요	논의하기
…	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 아니요	논의하기
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 아니요	논의하기
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 아니요	논의하기