结构 · Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

问题

Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

一方是否显著影响另一方？达到所投票数的四分之三即为定论。

已关闭 · 返回行动阶段

正以访客身份查看。输入用户名即可加入并参与。

问题在各小组之间分配，所以你拿到的是分给你们小组的那些——不是全部 180 个。

为什么

没有人能回答几百个卡片对。每个卡片对交给一个小组；意见分裂的卡片对会再转给其他小组，所以它可能稍后出现在你的列表中，即使它起初在别处。已定数量包括所有小组的工作，所以它增长得比你自己的列表缩短得快。

已定 178 / 180 0 个待你回答

上次计票：178 个已定 · 0 个上交跨组评审组 · 0 个有争议 · 2 个未达法定人数 — 每个评审组至少需要 max(2, 评审组人数的 75%) 张票；你们最小的评审组有 15 名成员.

关闭 ✕

We would pay more if the work carried the price → 有影响？ → So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses

还没有人发言。

已完成的阶段——卡片对和投票的记录见上方。检查逻辑 ↗

Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	未定	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	未定	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✓ 是	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ 是	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ 是	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ 是	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✓ 是	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ 是	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ 是	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ 是	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✓ 是	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ 是	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ 是	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ 是	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ 是	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ 是	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ 是	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ 是	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ 是	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✓ 是	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✓ 是	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✓ 是	讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ 是	讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ 是	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ 是	讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✓ 是	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ 推断	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ 推断	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ 推断	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 否	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 否	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 否	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 否	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 否	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 否	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 否	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 否	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 否	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 否	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 否	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 否	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 否	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 否	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 否	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 否	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 否	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 否	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 否	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 否	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 否	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 否	讨论
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 否	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 否	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 否	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 否	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 否	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 否	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 否	讨论
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 否	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 否	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 否	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 否	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 否	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ 否	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 否	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 否	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 否	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ 否	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 否	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 否	讨论
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ 否	讨论
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 否	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 否	讨论
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 否	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ 否	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ 否	讨论
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 否	讨论
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ 否	讨论
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ 否	讨论
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ 否	讨论
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 否	讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 否	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 否	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 否	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 否	当前焦点 ↑ · 关闭 ✕
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 否	讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 否	讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 否	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 否	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 否	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 否	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 否	讨论
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 否	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 否	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 否	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 否	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ 否	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 否	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 否	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 否	讨论
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 否	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 否	讨论
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 否	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ 否	讨论
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ 否	讨论
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ 否	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 否	讨论
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ 否	讨论
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	…	✗ 否	讨论
…	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ 否	讨论
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ 否	讨论
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ 否	讨论