Strukturering · Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

SPØRSMÅLET

Why does a steady life take more than it used to?

Påvirker det ene det andre i betydelig grad? Tre firedeler av de avgitte stemmene avgjør.

Du ser på som gjest. Skriv inn et brukernavn for å bli med og delta.

Spørsmålene fordeles mellom gruppene, så du får dem gruppen din ble tildelt — ikke alle 180.

hvorfor

Ingen kunne svart på flere hundre par. Hvert par går til én gruppe; et par som deler gruppen, sendes så videre til andre grupper, så det kan dukke opp i listen din senere selv om det startet et annet sted. Antallet avgjorte omfatter alle gruppenes arbeid, og derfor stiger det raskere enn din egen liste krymper.

avgjort: 178 / 180 til deg å svare på: 0

Siste opptelling: avgjort 178 · sendt videre til paneler på tvers av grupper 0 · omstridt 0 · under kvorum 2 — paneler trenger minst max(2, 75% av panelet) avgitte stemmer; ditt minste panel har 15 medlemmer.

lukk ✕

Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on → påvirker? → A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability

Ingenting sagt ennå.

Fullført fase — protokollen over par og stemmer står ovenfor.Sjekk logikken ↗

Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	åpent	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	åpent	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✓ ja	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ ja	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ ja	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ ja	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✓ ja	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ ja	diskuter
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✓ ja	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ ja	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✓ ja	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ ja	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ ja	diskuter
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✓ ja	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ ja	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✓ ja	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ ja	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ ja	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ ja	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✓ ja	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✓ ja	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✓ ja	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ ja	diskuter
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✓ ja	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✓ ja	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✓ ja	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✓ utledet	diskuter
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✓ utledet	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✓ utledet	diskuter
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nei	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nei	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nei	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nei	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nei	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nei	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nei	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nei	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nei	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nei	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nei	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nei	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nei	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nei	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nei	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nei	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nei	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nei	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nei	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nei	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nei	diskuter
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nei	diskuter
A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nei	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nei	diskuter
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nei	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nei	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nei	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nei	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nei	diskuter
Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nei	diskuter
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nei	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nei	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nei	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nei	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A single wage no longer supports a household	✗ nei	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nei	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nei	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nei	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Cash flow, not profit, decides whether anyone is hired	✗ nei	diskuter
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nei	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nei	diskuter
Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	→	Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	✗ nei	diskuter
Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nei	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nei	i fokus ↑ · lukk ✕
Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nei	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	✗ nei	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	A large competitor can absorb a regulation that would close us	✗ nei	diskuter
A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	→	Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nei	diskuter
Employers' taxes are charged on the person, so people are the thing to cut	→	Every new rule consolidates the market a little more	✗ nei	diskuter
Every cost that rose was passed to us and could not be passed on	→	Consolidation removes the employer competition that raised wages	✗ nei	diskuter
A single wage no longer supports a household	→	A machine is a capital allowance and a worker is a liability	✗ nei	diskuter
Energy, rent and insurance tripled and the invoice did not	→	Assets rose faster than wages for four decades	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nei	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nei	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nei	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nei	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nei	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nei	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nei	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nei	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nei	diskuter
So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nei	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nei	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nei	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nei	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	We would pay more if the work carried the price	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nei	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nei	diskuter
We would pay more if the work carried the price	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nei	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nei	diskuter
Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	✗ nei	diskuter
Hiring someone permanently now feels like signing a mortgage	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	So we use contracts and agencies and everyone loses	✗ nei	diskuter
So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	→	Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	✗ nei	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nei	diskuter
The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	→	Nobody in a ministry has ever met a payroll	✗ nei	diskuter
What used to be a job is now a series of contracts	→	…	✗ nei	diskuter
…	→	So nobody trains and everyone complains about skills	✗ nei	diskuter
Business representation is dominated by firms unlike ours	→	The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	✗ nei	diskuter
The things that used to be bought once are now rented forever	→	The rules make dismissal costly, so we do not hire in the first place	✗ nei	diskuter